(one=lowest rating; 5=
highest rating)
11. Did the
conference lead you to consider any follow-up activities (whether from sessions or
contacts you made at the Forum)?
12. In your opinion, what
made this Forum different from any other conferences on HIV/AIDS?
(one=lowest rating; 5=
highest rating)
14. How would you rate the
quality of the conference facilities?
(one=lowest rating; 5
highest rating)
15. Did you use the
cybercafe?
16. If yes, how
useful did you find it
(one=lowest rating; 5=
highest rating)
17. Did you visit the exhibition?
18. If yes, how interesting or useful did you find it?
(one=lowest rating; 5=
highest rating)
19. Did you receive the conference documents?
20. How
would you rate the quality of the documents? (check one)
(one=lowest rating;
5=highest rating)
21. How would you rate the effectiveness of conference logistics?
(one=lowest rating;
5=highest rating)
22. What aspect of the conference did you like the most?
23. What aspect of the conference did you like the least?
24. Which of the conference sessions did you find most useful?
25. Which of the conference sessions did you find least useful?
26. How would you rate the overall effectiveness of the conference?
(one=lowest rating;
5=highest rating)
27. What
features of the conference, in your view, contributed to its effectiveness?
28. What features of the conference, in your view, detracted from its
effectiveness?
29. What suggestions could you make to ECA for improvement of next
years ADF (on another topic?)