LG Stories


 

 

About AISI

ICT Policies

I & K Development

Networking & Partnership

Outreach

Links

  Home > What's New? > LG Workshop > Some Stories

Workshop on Innovative Application of ICTS in Local Governance in Developing Countries, 7 - 9 June 2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Some Stories ....

Nudging African Countries Towards ICT
By Ayenew Haile Selassie

“It is very easy to look at ICTs as technology, which puts a lot of people off. You have to look at the three dimensions in ICT: the Information, the Communication and the Technology. You are thinking of people, organisation and the dynamics of organisation, and how this can be facilitated through the technology.” These words, slightly paraphrased, were spoken by Dr Kadmiel Wekwete, Director of the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), during the opening of the Workshop on Innovative Application of ICTS IN Local Governance in Developing Countries, which took place in Addis Ababa, 7-9, June, 2004.

The Workshop, which was jointly organized by the UNECA, UNCDF and IDRC, was, according to Dr Wekwete, a result of the discussions on the importance of bringing together professionals for a dialogue on ICT & GOVERNANCE.

The workshop is organized at an opportune moment when decentralisation is becoming a la mode in the continent, with many countries working towards strengthening local governments to which they are ceding lots of responsibilities to them. There are 441 local governments in Senegal, for example, according to Prof Yero Sylla, executive secretary of SAFEFOD, a Senegalese NGO, represented by him at the workshop. Uganda has 74 higher local governments, and in Ethiopia lots of authority is passed by the federal government to the nine regional governments, which in turn are divided in to hundreds of Woreda Administrations, each with degrees of authorities delegated to them. The issue of local government is so close to the heart of many countries that some, like Uganda and Senegal, have ministries of Local Governments.

The importance of local governments arises from the fact that they are closer to the people than central governments and, if properly equipped, are more likely to address the problems of the people and work towards the success of both NEPAD and the MDGs.

ICTs, as a means to an end or as a tool, have a lot to offer for the performance of local governments and the fulfilment of governance, which is an element of NEPAD. And the academia is supposed to do researches that will help realise this, which was one of the objectives a workshop subsequently organised on Academia Research Network.

“To give ICTs more human perspective, to make them more people friendly, we have to bring them closer to people who manage people. … Without the marriage of ICT and governance, we can not make ICTs serve people,” said Ms Karima Bounerma Ben Soltane, Director of DISD, UNECA, emphasising the role ICT has to play in governance.

This marriage, though slow, is already taking place in some parts of Africa, South Africa being in the forefront in taking advantages of the potentials of the tool, and Egypt closely following. The Ugandan Ministry of Local Government has an Information Systems section under the Policy and Planning Division, which is working to make the potentials of ICT available to the local authorities who “are yearning to use ICT,” according to Constantine Bitawayiki, principal information technology scientist and planner at the Ministry of Local Government of Uganda. The Local Government information and Communications System, in which the World Bank is helping, has already been applied in 21 of the 74 local governments in the country, Constantine said.

Dr Petros Olango, the deputy speaker of the house of people’s representatives of Ethiopia had said during a recent workshop in Tanzania, that not only would the Ethiopian parliament have its own website, just like its Tanzanian counterpart, but that even most of the major ministries would have local area networks that would be accessible to the parliamentarians. He had also expressed his government’s intention to have 600 districts all over the country that would have Internet access.

According to a paper presented by Aida Opoku-Mensah, ICT team leader at DISD, a survey has identified 99 local government web sites in 26 African countries, most of which belonged to regional states and municipalities. The same paper indicated that only 26 African countries have ICT policies, and 13 others are in process, although much fewer is the number of countries that have implementation plans for the policies.

Roland McGill defines local governance as the concept of the quality of relationships between governed and governors that yield meaningful and local relevant socio economic development, and sees ICT as an aid to the fulfilment of that. The challenge facing the continent, and that was deliberated by the workshop on governance was the subject of the deployment of ICT for local development by “integrating the T (Technology) with the I & C (Information and Communication).”

For one reason or another use of ICTs in the continent is still rather slow. In Zambia, Ethiopia and many other African countries, available PCs are used for little more than word processing and excel. In Senegal two studies that were done seven years apart arrived at the same conclusion: negligible use of ICT in the management of local governments. Where infrastructure and other related issues are moderately resolved, ICTs still find little use because of the absence of local content that is both understandable and relevant to Africans.

Laurent Elder, IDRC programme officer, sees the major problem in African governments, which, he says, express their desire to be part of the information society and say that they want their population to benefit from ICTs, but do not provide the enabling environment. “The technology is there, and it is cheap. There are technological innovations allowing easy access, like WIFI, WIMAX and Voice over IP, but we cannot use these technologies in Africa because policies and regulations do not allow this,” he said.

“Finger pointing is not the solution,” comments Ms Bounerma. Telecom companies are a big source of income for African countries, hence their hesitation to liberalise the market. “In the west they have not privatised and liberalised overnight,” she says. “It is worth taking sometime to consider how to open the telecom market to competition. The private sector can do better. We have to analyse why they are not coming out more proactively. No finger pointing, we only need to find out the problem.”

Uganda has had a taste of the fruits of the involvement of the private sector n the telecommunications sector. In four years after allowing mobile telephone operators, Celtel and MTN have helped increase the service by 400 per cent.

Ms Bounerma says that if governments did not understand they could be helped, but “the academia have not done their part to make things clear and help governments to make the right decision.”
The African academia that were brought together by the ECA for the Academia Network workshop, most of whom are already working on ECA supported projects, have left Addis Ababa with responsibilities of a number of essential research topics piled on their shoulders. A lot is expected to come out of their joint efforts.

  

Making ICT Useful for Development
By Ayenew Haile Selassie

It was March 2003, and the world was holding its breath and waiting in suspense for the news when America would imminently wage war on Sadam's Iraq. Scores of people who were in Kyoto, Japan, to attend the Third World Water Forum, had escaped the tense moment and gone to visit the Temple of the Thousand Buddhas. While they were marveling at the hundreds of bronze statues of the saint, one man heard a beep on his mobile phone. It was a message, a mobile news service from Cable News Network- THE BOMBING OF IRAQ HAD JUST STARTED. This man, who did not have to sit in front of a TV set or carry around a radio to get the news, stopped everyone, the ones he knew and he did not, and broke the news of the war, with more pride than shock because of the technology he had in his hands. It was as though he was George W. Bush himself, and had just given the order for the war.

Medical doctors in Uganda are practicing with small hand held computers through which they wish to exchange health related data and information. The gadget has the capacity to connect to the internet, should the service be available in the area, which the doctors are trying to arrange in a pilot project they have embarked on. While they wait for the opportunities to use the machine at its full potentials, they are basking in the sense of prestige its possession has created, according to Dr Patrick Okello, who is director of this project on health information network.

Good old Information is at its zenith in today's world, which it has claimed for itself. Possession of information and the means by which it could be conveyed or communicated are at once a cause of dignity, happiness as well as security and development- for those who know what to do with what they have. The issue for Africa today is how to make Information and Communication Technologies available (be it radio, mobile phones, or the whole gamut) as well as how to mainstream them into the continents development and poverty reduction agenda.

Mona Afifi, ICT Specialist with the UNCDF said, "We know that the technology is here to stay. So if you are forgotten today, you are going to be forgotten tomorrow."

"Unless we are to involve the machingas," said a participant at the recent ICT workshop for Tanzanian parliamentarians, "we could not progress." His argument was that such people could intervene in ways that the intellectuals could not imagine. Machingas are people who carried around the goods that they sell, and ICTs need to help them sell their products more easily and faster, according to this person- like Ugandan farmers are today exploiting mobile phones.

For Afifi people should always be central in all debates or initiatives related to ICTs, because it is they who are going to use them to make government more efficient, who understand that there are plenty of opportunities in government, health, education, or to generate income. "We involve people to solve their own problems," she said.

She tells with amazement the story of a Jordanian ostrich farmer "in the middle of the desert", who had access to the internet where he was and was able to boost his weakening business because he was able to use the technology to find a market, a thing which he could not have done by other means. Karima Bounerma Ben Soultane, director of DISD at the UNECA, could barely hide her emotions when she spoke of her encounter with a blind man using PowerPoint.

In the developed world, increasing use of ICT is having direct and immediate impacts in the economy. As more and more information is exchanged at greater ease and speed, ever-decreasing amounts of physical goods have to be transported. Walmarts, which are responsible for 30pc of retail trade in the USA, have set up information networks with their suppliers. These networks, according to Dr Michael Gurstein, visiting professor at New Jersey Institute of Technology, has been so established that a good amount of the commodities could reach the consumer before they are even delivered to the warehouses. He says that ICTs have transformed the way all kinds of business are conducted. Going home after some years in Africa, Torvald Akesson, Swedish ambassador to Tanzania, noticed with wonderment that on-line booking had cleared most of the offices of travel agencies from the streets of his country.

In these early years of the 21st century, Africa finds itself at a definitive juncture either to continue in disease and poverty or to turn around and prosper; ICTs are proving themselves very fast as indispensable tools of development to achieve the latter.

If a Ugandan farmer could use his mobile to sell his maize, if a Jordanian farmer could have access to the internet in the middle of the desert and if a blind Ethiopian could comfortably use PowerPoint, and, in the words of Afifi, "if we have vision that ICT has infinite possibilities, then the vision will drive us to explore how ICT application will allow society to develop."

  
INTERVIEW

Breaking the addiction of proprietary software

Bildad Kagai is Coordinator of FOSSFA(in full?) and Chief Executive Officer of Circuits & Packets Communications Ltd, a Nairobi based ICT Company. He was in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, recently to attend the UNCDF/IDRC/UNECA Workshop on Innovative Application of ICTs in Local Governance in developing Countries, Which took place 7-9, June 2004. He talked with Ayenew Haileselassie on issues surrounding the application of open source software solutions in Africa.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Using open source is more of a reactionary movement against Microsoft than of any benefit to Africa. Do you disagree?

BILDAD KAGAI. I totally disagree. There is nothing that has changed. It is just a normal business, like any other business. If we are to develop our own software, customise it from the beginning, and then probably close it, it is going to cost us millions of dollars, which we do not have access to. There is no point of reinventing the wheel. The option that we are left with is to work as a community. We have a population of 800 million in Africa; that is a good market for a number of people to participate in this industry. That is why we decided to go open source. What we are against, when it comes to Microsoft, is the policies they have in place. The advantages they are taking of uneducated governments by giving them software free of charge, so they can make them get used to them, and then later on they are going to pay for this kind of software and they will be hooked up. It is like an addiction which we are trying to fight.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Why open source? Has the use of proprietary software delayed the digitalisation of Africa in anyway?

BILDAD KAGAI We are talking about addressing the issues of the digital gap that exists between Africa and Europe, or Africa and the US. I think the bottom line is that at least for once we are getting it right. We are getting into the industry at the right time. There has been a lot of dumping from cars to computers. When it comes to technology, we are saying that we can develop our own technology at par with the other continents. A good example is Asia. Just a few years ago, they were not where they are now in terms of technology. They have managed to bridge the gap. Africa also has the opportunity to use its own technology, empower its people and narrow the digital gap.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Has the use of proprietary software interfered with the narrowing of the gap?

BILDAD KAGAI We have no problem with proprietary software. We actually say that we want an environment where both can coexist and work and even probably assist each other. We could have common training facilities, where, if it is the training language, Java, C++, and so on, we can have common people supporting that kind of training in Africa. If people decide to choose to work with proprietary or open source, it is up to them. They shall have that freedom.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Would a wide spread use of open source not be a disincentive to African software developers who would like to make some money?

BILDAD KAGAI It is not. What we are trying to do is get into the industry early. We don’t want to be left in this train again. We in Africa were left behind in industrialisation. What we are saying right now is that we accept that we do not have the money to develop software at the scope of what Microsoft, Oracle or IBM are doing. But we can start with open source and be at par technologically. Eventually, as governments, the largest consumers of ICTs, continue buying locally, we can have the capacity even to continue developing farther.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. But what is the incentive for a developer to continue developing open source software? How exactly will an open source software developer make money out of it, and will that person be able to make as much money as in the proprietary software? An open source once sold is distributed for free.

BILDAD KAGAI Studies have indicated that licenses only cost six to ten per cent of the entire ICT cost. It does not matter how far it is really distributed. It is actually better for the developer of that software. What really counts nowadays is the training and maintenance of that software: if it really is your own knowledge, and you are the one who has been working at the intricacies of that software, they will come back to you for those particular components.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. But someone whose sole job is developing open source software will sell his product only once. After that it is distributed for free. So how is that person going to make money?

BILDAD KAGAI It all depends on your business model. We are trying to replicate what other internationally renowned software developing companies, Red Heart, Suze, and so on are doing. They have managed to set up profitable business models. They will develop the software, improve on it, but target to make their money on training and maintenance. I have to insist, don’t look at it exclusively, that you just have to sell the CD. It is not like a music CD. When you look at the music CD, you can think about just selling the CD for 20 or 50 shillings and benefiting the person who has that content on CD, the musician.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. With the low level of Internet access in Africa, we could not download open source software for free. We would still have to go and buy it. So how free is open source?

BILDAD KAGAI When we talk about open source being free, we talk about it being free in terms of the freedoms of using, not free in terms of getting for free, because by the end of the day we need to develop Africa economically. There are companies that are coming up almost everywhere in Africa now that are working on open source solutions. What we are saying is that it is better for you to go and buy books and open source on CDs from the local company, for even if it is 40 of 60 dollars, it is better than buying a license from Microsoft for 450 dollars.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. What do you mean by free in freedom?

BILDAD KAGAI The free in freedom is the ability to--- you get the source code, and when you get the source code, you can actually alter it, customise it to your particular needs. You also have the authority and the permission after you have customised it to redistribute freely to the rest of the community so that they can benefit from the improvements that you have done on it. You are not restricted to use open source in any form or capacity. You can always change the source code to suit your needs. That is the freedom that we appreciate.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Customising open source software requires a high level of awareness by the users, most of whom are using a tiny fraction of the potential of proprietary software. So how appealing would customising be to users?

BILDAD KAGAI I think that is a stereotype that has to be broken. It is not really difficult. If you are really interested in opening, say, an open source company, you can pick components from various Linux distributions that we have, customise for your local need, for your local country, and actually start a business. Circuits and Packets have done that. A company called Impi in South Africa has also started its own distribution. In Kenya we call it Ngoma Linux. We are now developing solutions and the clients know that they can get support locally from Nairobi, because that is where we are based.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Maybe getting professionals to customise it to your needs is more expensive than using proprietary software.

BILDAD KAGAI : That is actually the most unfortunate statement I have heard, because students of computer science not only at the university level but even at college level actually experiment mostly with solutions and programmes where they can get access to the source code. Only open source gives them that particular access. You will be surprised when you hook up with your local Linux user groups asking may be for very complex question which you thought can not be answered locally, you will be surprised to find it answered from the most unexpected corner of your country, when you are thinking that for those kinds of questions you will have to refer to people in India or America to solve them.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Are there any major achievements in introducing and popularising open source in Africa so far?

BILDAD KAGAI : At http://www.fossfa.net you will find everything that is happening in Africa with regard to open source. The response is brilliant. The response is good. I am convinced that we will not be left behind this time around in Africa.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. The Open Source Task Force for Africa had a mission to bring together individuals and organisations working on open source in Africa. To what extent was the Task Force able to do this?

BILDAD KAGAI Probably beyond what our expectations were. We not only have private sector members and civil society, but we also have responsive governments with in Africa sitting in the FOSSFA council. It is brilliant. USAID, DFID, UNDP are observers within the FOSSFA council. We have people at government level in Tunisia, South Africa. In the private sector we have companies like Obsidian, Linux Solutions of Uganda, and Circuits and Packets Communications of Kenya.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. FOSSFA is determined to develop local capacity and create jobs in Africa by developing a FOSS market that will initially target public sector. Why focus on the public sector?

BILDAD KAGAI We focus on the public sector because the public sector accounts for 60 to 70 percent of the total spent on ICT in a country, so that is where we can have tangible impact at national level.

AYENEW H.SELASSIE. What are the challenges facing open source?

BILDAD KAGAI I think the challenge is to change the mindset of most of the partners, especially on how research and reporting on open source is being done, and the notion that we are talking of possibly a strategy that cannot develop a sustainable business model. These are stereotypes that we have to break. The other stereotype that we have to break is that people think that open source is for programmers and developers, that it is complex. It is not! If we compare open source and Microsoft, there actually is no difference. A study in India has shown that the people who changed from Microsoft to Linux had no problems.

LG Stories


Copyright © 1999-2005  Economic Commission for Africa (ECA). All Rights Reserved.

For comments and sugestions about this web site, contact the Webmaster
Last updated: March 3, 2005