|
LG
Stories
About AISI
ICT Policies
I & K Development
Networking & Partnership
Outreach
Links
|
Home > What's
New? > LG Workshop > Some
Stories
| Workshop
on Innovative Application of ICTS in Local Governance in Developing
Countries, 7 - 9 June 2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia |
| Some
Stories ....
|
|
Nudging
African Countries Towards ICT
By Ayenew Haile Selassie
“It
is very easy to look at ICTs as technology, which puts a lot of
people off. You have to look at the three dimensions in ICT: the
Information, the Communication and the Technology. You are thinking
of people, organisation and the dynamics of organisation, and
how this can be facilitated through the technology.” These
words, slightly paraphrased, were spoken by Dr Kadmiel Wekwete,
Director of the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF),
during the opening of the Workshop on Innovative Application of
ICTS IN Local Governance in Developing Countries, which took place
in Addis Ababa, 7-9, June, 2004.
The
Workshop, which was jointly organized by the UNECA, UNCDF and
IDRC, was, according to Dr Wekwete, a result of the discussions
on the importance of bringing together professionals for a dialogue
on ICT & GOVERNANCE.
The
workshop is organized at an opportune moment when decentralisation
is becoming a la mode in the continent, with many countries working
towards strengthening local governments to which they are ceding
lots of responsibilities to them. There are 441 local governments
in Senegal, for example, according to Prof Yero Sylla, executive
secretary of SAFEFOD, a Senegalese NGO, represented by him at
the workshop. Uganda has 74 higher local governments, and in Ethiopia
lots of authority is passed by the federal government to the nine
regional governments, which in turn are divided in to hundreds
of Woreda Administrations, each with degrees of authorities delegated
to them. The issue of local government is so close to the heart
of many countries that some, like Uganda and Senegal, have ministries
of Local Governments.
The
importance of local governments arises from the fact that they
are closer to the people than central governments and, if properly
equipped, are more likely to address the problems of the people
and work towards the success of both NEPAD and the MDGs.
ICTs,
as a means to an end or as a tool, have a lot to offer for the
performance of local governments and the fulfilment of governance,
which is an element of NEPAD. And the academia is supposed to
do researches that will help realise this, which was one of the
objectives a workshop subsequently organised on Academia Research
Network.
“To
give ICTs more human perspective, to make them more people friendly,
we have to bring them closer to people who manage people. …
Without the marriage of ICT and governance, we can not make ICTs
serve people,” said Ms Karima Bounerma Ben Soltane, Director
of DISD, UNECA, emphasising the role ICT has to play in governance.
This
marriage, though slow, is already taking place in some parts of
Africa, South Africa being in the forefront in taking advantages
of the potentials of the tool, and Egypt closely following. The
Ugandan Ministry of Local Government has an Information Systems
section under the Policy and Planning Division, which is working
to make the potentials of ICT available to the local authorities
who “are yearning to use ICT,” according to Constantine
Bitawayiki, principal information technology scientist and planner
at the Ministry of Local Government of Uganda. The Local Government
information and Communications System, in which the World Bank
is helping, has already been applied in 21 of the 74 local governments
in the country, Constantine said.
Dr
Petros Olango, the deputy speaker of the house of people’s
representatives of Ethiopia had said during a recent workshop
in Tanzania, that not only would the Ethiopian parliament have
its own website, just like its Tanzanian counterpart, but that
even most of the major ministries would have local area networks
that would be accessible to the parliamentarians. He had also
expressed his government’s intention to have 600 districts
all over the country that would have Internet access.
According
to a paper presented by Aida Opoku-Mensah, ICT team leader at
DISD, a survey has identified 99 local government web sites in
26 African countries, most of which belonged to regional states
and municipalities. The same paper indicated that only 26 African
countries have ICT policies, and 13 others are in process, although
much fewer is the number of countries that have implementation
plans for the policies.
Roland McGill defines local governance as the concept of the quality
of relationships between governed and governors that yield meaningful
and local relevant socio economic development, and sees ICT as
an aid to the fulfilment of that. The challenge facing the continent,
and that was deliberated by the workshop on governance was the
subject of the deployment of ICT for local development by “integrating
the T (Technology) with the I & C (Information and Communication).”
For
one reason or another use of ICTs in the continent is still rather
slow. In Zambia, Ethiopia and many other African countries, available
PCs are used for little more than word processing and excel. In
Senegal two studies that were done seven years apart arrived at
the same conclusion: negligible use of ICT in the management of
local governments. Where infrastructure and other related issues
are moderately resolved, ICTs still find little use because of
the absence of local content that is both understandable and relevant
to Africans.
Laurent
Elder, IDRC programme officer, sees the major problem in African
governments, which, he says, express their desire to be part of
the information society and say that they want their population
to benefit from ICTs, but do not provide the enabling environment.
“The technology is there, and it is cheap. There are technological
innovations allowing easy access, like WIFI, WIMAX and Voice over
IP, but we cannot use these technologies in Africa because policies
and regulations do not allow this,” he said.
“Finger
pointing is not the solution,” comments Ms Bounerma. Telecom
companies are a big source of income for African countries, hence
their hesitation to liberalise the market. “In the west
they have not privatised and liberalised overnight,” she
says. “It is worth taking sometime to consider how to open
the telecom market to competition. The private sector can do better.
We have to analyse why they are not coming out more proactively.
No finger pointing, we only need to find out the problem.”
Uganda
has had a taste of the fruits of the involvement of the private
sector n the telecommunications sector. In four years after allowing
mobile telephone operators, Celtel and MTN have helped increase
the service by 400 per cent.
Ms
Bounerma says that if governments did not understand they could
be helped, but “the academia have not done their part to
make things clear and help governments to make the right decision.”
The African academia that were brought together by the ECA for
the Academia Network workshop, most of whom are already working
on ECA supported projects, have left Addis Ababa with responsibilities
of a number of essential research topics piled on their shoulders.
A lot is expected to come out of their joint efforts.
|
| |
|
|
Making
ICT Useful for Development
By Ayenew Haile Selassie
It
was March 2003, and the world was holding its breath and waiting
in suspense for the news when America would imminently wage war
on Sadam's Iraq. Scores of people who were in Kyoto, Japan, to
attend the Third World Water Forum, had escaped the tense moment
and gone to visit the Temple of the Thousand Buddhas. While they
were marveling at the hundreds of bronze statues of the saint,
one man heard a beep on his mobile phone. It was a message, a
mobile news service from Cable News Network- THE BOMBING OF IRAQ
HAD JUST STARTED. This man, who did not have to sit in front of
a TV set or carry around a radio to get the news, stopped everyone,
the ones he knew and he did not, and broke the news of the war,
with more pride than shock because of the technology he had in
his hands. It was as though he was George W. Bush himself, and
had just given the order for the war.
Medical
doctors in Uganda are practicing with small hand held computers
through which they wish to exchange health related data and information.
The gadget has the capacity to connect to the internet, should
the service be available in the area, which the doctors are trying
to arrange in a pilot project they have embarked on. While they
wait for the opportunities to use the machine at its full potentials,
they are basking in the sense of prestige its possession has created,
according to Dr Patrick Okello, who is director of this project
on health information network.
Good
old Information is at its zenith in today's world, which it has
claimed for itself. Possession of information and the means by
which it could be conveyed or communicated are at once a cause
of dignity, happiness as well as security and development- for
those who know what to do with what they have. The issue for Africa
today is how to make Information and Communication Technologies
available (be it radio, mobile phones, or the whole gamut) as
well as how to mainstream them into the continents development
and poverty reduction agenda.
Mona
Afifi, ICT Specialist with the UNCDF said, "We know that
the technology is here to stay. So if you are forgotten today,
you are going to be forgotten tomorrow."
"Unless
we are to involve the machingas," said a participant at the
recent ICT workshop for Tanzanian parliamentarians, "we could
not progress." His argument was that such people could intervene
in ways that the intellectuals could not imagine. Machingas are
people who carried around the goods that they sell, and ICTs need
to help them sell their products more easily and faster, according
to this person- like Ugandan farmers are today exploiting mobile
phones.
For
Afifi people should always be central in all debates or initiatives
related to ICTs, because it is they who are going to use them
to make government more efficient, who understand that there are
plenty of opportunities in government, health, education, or to
generate income. "We involve people to solve their own problems,"
she said.
She
tells with amazement the story of a Jordanian ostrich farmer "in
the middle of the desert", who had access to the internet
where he was and was able to boost his weakening business because
he was able to use the technology to find a market, a thing which
he could not have done by other means. Karima Bounerma Ben Soultane,
director of DISD at the UNECA, could barely hide her emotions
when she spoke of her encounter with a blind man using PowerPoint.
In
the developed world, increasing use of ICT is having direct and
immediate impacts in the economy. As more and more information
is exchanged at greater ease and speed, ever-decreasing amounts
of physical goods have to be transported. Walmarts, which are
responsible for 30pc of retail trade in the USA, have set up information
networks with their suppliers. These networks, according to Dr
Michael Gurstein, visiting professor at New Jersey Institute of
Technology, has been so established that a good amount of the
commodities could reach the consumer before they are even delivered
to the warehouses. He says that ICTs have transformed the way
all kinds of business are conducted. Going home after some years
in Africa, Torvald Akesson, Swedish ambassador to Tanzania, noticed
with wonderment that on-line booking had cleared most of the offices
of travel agencies from the streets of his country.
In
these early years of the 21st century, Africa finds itself at
a definitive juncture either to continue in disease and poverty
or to turn around and prosper; ICTs are proving themselves very
fast as indispensable tools of development to achieve the latter.
If
a Ugandan farmer could use his mobile to sell his maize, if a
Jordanian farmer could have access to the internet in the middle
of the desert and if a blind Ethiopian could comfortably use PowerPoint,
and, in the words of Afifi, "if we have vision that ICT has
infinite possibilities, then the vision will drive us to explore
how ICT application will allow society to develop."
|
| |
| INTERVIEW
Breaking the addiction
of proprietary software
Bildad Kagai is Coordinator
of FOSSFA(in full?) and Chief Executive Officer of Circuits &
Packets Communications Ltd, a Nairobi based ICT Company. He was
in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, recently to attend the UNCDF/IDRC/UNECA
Workshop on Innovative Application of ICTs in Local Governance
in developing Countries, Which took place 7-9, June 2004. He talked
with Ayenew Haileselassie on issues surrounding the application
of open source software solutions in Africa.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Using open
source is more of a reactionary movement against Microsoft than
of any benefit to Africa. Do you disagree?
BILDAD KAGAI. I totally disagree.
There is nothing that has changed. It is just a normal business,
like any other business. If we are to develop our own software,
customise it from the beginning, and then probably close it, it
is going to cost us millions of dollars, which we do not have
access to. There is no point of reinventing the wheel. The option
that we are left with is to work as a community. We have a population
of 800 million in Africa; that is a good market for a number of
people to participate in this industry. That is why we decided
to go open source. What we are against, when it comes to Microsoft,
is the policies they have in place. The advantages they are taking
of uneducated governments by giving them software free of charge,
so they can make them get used to them, and then later on they
are going to pay for this kind of software and they will be hooked
up. It is like an addiction which we are trying to fight.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Why open
source? Has the use of proprietary software delayed the digitalisation
of Africa in anyway?
BILDAD KAGAI We are talking
about addressing the issues of the digital gap that exists between
Africa and Europe, or Africa and the US. I think the bottom line
is that at least for once we are getting it right. We are getting
into the industry at the right time. There has been a lot of dumping
from cars to computers. When it comes to technology, we are saying
that we can develop our own technology at par with the other continents.
A good example is Asia. Just a few years ago, they were not where
they are now in terms of technology. They have managed to bridge
the gap. Africa also has the opportunity to use its own technology,
empower its people and narrow the digital gap.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Has the use
of proprietary software interfered with the narrowing of the gap?
BILDAD KAGAI We have no problem
with proprietary software. We actually say that we want an environment
where both can coexist and work and even probably assist each
other. We could have common training facilities, where, if it
is the training language, Java, C++, and so on, we can have common
people supporting that kind of training in Africa. If people decide
to choose to work with proprietary or open source, it is up to
them. They shall have that freedom.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Would a wide
spread use of open source not be a disincentive to African software
developers who would like to make some money?
BILDAD KAGAI It is not. What
we are trying to do is get into the industry early. We don’t
want to be left in this train again. We in Africa were left behind
in industrialisation. What we are saying right now is that we
accept that we do not have the money to develop software at the
scope of what Microsoft, Oracle or IBM are doing. But we can start
with open source and be at par technologically. Eventually, as
governments, the largest consumers of ICTs, continue buying locally,
we can have the capacity even to continue developing farther.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. But what
is the incentive for a developer to continue developing open source
software? How exactly will an open source software developer make
money out of it, and will that person be able to make as much
money as in the proprietary software? An open source once sold
is distributed for free.
BILDAD KAGAI Studies have indicated
that licenses only cost six to ten per cent of the entire ICT
cost. It does not matter how far it is really distributed. It
is actually better for the developer of that software. What really
counts nowadays is the training and maintenance of that software:
if it really is your own knowledge, and you are the one who has
been working at the intricacies of that software, they will come
back to you for those particular components.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. But someone
whose sole job is developing open source software will sell his
product only once. After that it is distributed for free. So how
is that person going to make money?
BILDAD KAGAI It all depends
on your business model. We are trying to replicate what other
internationally renowned software developing companies, Red Heart,
Suze, and so on are doing. They have managed to set up profitable
business models. They will develop the software, improve on it,
but target to make their money on training and maintenance. I
have to insist, don’t look at it exclusively, that you just
have to sell the CD. It is not like a music CD. When you look
at the music CD, you can think about just selling the CD for 20
or 50 shillings and benefiting the person who has that content
on CD, the musician.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. With the
low level of Internet access in Africa, we could not download
open source software for free. We would still have to go and buy
it. So how free is open source?
BILDAD KAGAI When we talk about
open source being free, we talk about it being free in terms of
the freedoms of using, not free in terms of getting for free,
because by the end of the day we need to develop Africa economically.
There are companies that are coming up almost everywhere in Africa
now that are working on open source solutions. What we are saying
is that it is better for you to go and buy books and open source
on CDs from the local company, for even if it is 40 of 60 dollars,
it is better than buying a license from Microsoft for 450 dollars.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. What do you
mean by free in freedom?
BILDAD KAGAI The free in freedom
is the ability to--- you get the source code, and when you get
the source code, you can actually alter it, customise it to your
particular needs. You also have the authority and the permission
after you have customised it to redistribute freely to the rest
of the community so that they can benefit from the improvements
that you have done on it. You are not restricted to use open source
in any form or capacity. You can always change the source code
to suit your needs. That is the freedom that we appreciate.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Customising
open source software requires a high level of awareness by the
users, most of whom are using a tiny fraction of the potential
of proprietary software. So how appealing would customising be
to users?
BILDAD KAGAI I think that is
a stereotype that has to be broken. It is not really difficult.
If you are really interested in opening, say, an open source company,
you can pick components from various Linux distributions that
we have, customise for your local need, for your local country,
and actually start a business. Circuits and Packets have done
that. A company called Impi in South Africa has also started its
own distribution. In Kenya we call it Ngoma Linux. We are now
developing solutions and the clients know that they can get support
locally from Nairobi, because that is where we are based.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Maybe getting
professionals to customise it to your needs is more expensive
than using proprietary software.
BILDAD KAGAI : That is actually
the most unfortunate statement I have heard, because students
of computer science not only at the university level but even
at college level actually experiment mostly with solutions and
programmes where they can get access to the source code. Only
open source gives them that particular access. You will be surprised
when you hook up with your local Linux user groups asking may
be for very complex question which you thought can not be answered
locally, you will be surprised to find it answered from the most
unexpected corner of your country, when you are thinking that
for those kinds of questions you will have to refer to people
in India or America to solve them.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. Are there
any major achievements in introducing and popularising open source
in Africa so far?
BILDAD KAGAI : At http://www.fossfa.net
you will find everything that is happening in Africa with regard
to open source. The response is brilliant. The response is good.
I am convinced that we will not be left behind this time around
in Africa.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. The Open
Source Task Force for Africa had a mission to bring together individuals
and organisations working on open source in Africa. To what extent
was the Task Force able to do this?
BILDAD KAGAI Probably beyond
what our expectations were. We not only have private sector members
and civil society, but we also have responsive governments with
in Africa sitting in the FOSSFA council. It is brilliant. USAID,
DFID, UNDP are observers within the FOSSFA council. We have people
at government level in Tunisia, South Africa. In the private sector
we have companies like Obsidian, Linux Solutions of Uganda, and
Circuits and Packets Communications of Kenya.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. FOSSFA is
determined to develop local capacity and create jobs in Africa
by developing a FOSS market that will initially target public
sector. Why focus on the public sector?
BILDAD KAGAI We focus on the
public sector because the public sector accounts for 60 to 70
percent of the total spent on ICT in a country, so that is where
we can have tangible impact at national level.
AYENEW H.SELASSIE. What are
the challenges facing open source?
BILDAD KAGAI I think the challenge
is to change the mindset of most of the partners, especially on
how research and reporting on open source is being done, and the
notion that we are talking of possibly a strategy that cannot
develop a sustainable business model. These are stereotypes that
we have to break. The other stereotype that we have to break is
that people think that open source is for programmers and developers,
that it is complex. It is not! If we compare open source and Microsoft,
there actually is no difference. A study in India has shown that
the people who changed from Microsoft to Linux had no problems.
|
|