Home Page | Background |
NICI Infrastructure | NICI
Policy | Internet
Connectivity | NICI Indicators |
||
|
Ethiopia |
|
![]()
The Impact of the Introduction of Electronic Communication in Ethiopia: A Survey
1st ESS Conference on Ethiopian Telecommunications in the Information Age, Washington, DC, July 2nd, 1996
![]()
Electronic communications, more specifically electronic mail services were introduced in Ethiopia by the Pan African Development Information System (PADIS), with the establishment of a network called PADISnet. In 1995, a survey was made to investigate the impact of these services. Some impact indicators were identified and they show that the overall impact was positive.
Introduction
Electronic communication (computer-mediated communication for sending and/or receiving messages/mail via the telephone line) is a recent development in Africa. As usual, the initiative to introduce electronic communication technology and services was that of a foreign donor agency, the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) of Canada. IDRC funded such projects as "Computer Networking in Africa" and "Capacity Building for Electronic Communication in Africa(CABECA)" which improved the infrastructure and capacity of various organizations and Academic institutions in Africa in terms of hardware and software for electronic connectivity (Hafkin & Menou 1995).
The Pan African Development Information System(PADIS) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa(UNECA) implemented both the IDRC initiated projects. PADISnet (the only electronic mail node in Ethiopia serving the majority of E-mail and electronic Bulletin Board Service(BBS) users in the country) and other similar Fido-based nodes throughout Africa were established as a result of the implementation of the two projects.
As part of the IDRC initiated Impact Study being undertaken in various countries and focusing on different aspects of impact, the main objective of this survey was to "contribute to the development of indicators for the measurement of the impact of information and to assess the impact of electronic communications(telematics) on development in Africa" (Hafkin & Menou 1995, p.72).
A list of 222 entry points(an entry point has a unique point number) registered with the PADISnet and active(no breakdown reported) during the month of October 1994 was obtained from the PADISnet system operator (SysOp). In consultation with the SysOp, the entry points were then stratified into five(5) groups of organizations, namely Private/Individual, Academic & research, International, Governmental, and Non-governmental.
Further stratification based on the traffic data (the number of messages sent and received at the entry points) for January and February 1995 was done to form the Low (0-30 messages), Medium (31-60 messages), High(61-122 messages) and Very High (>122 messages) levels of use group. After the entry points being used by users outside the country were excluded, the number of active entry points during January & February 1995 decreased to 206 and their distribution is shown in Table 1 below.
Level of Use |
Type of Organization |
|||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/ Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total |
|
| Low | 46 22.33%) |
16 (7.77%) |
24 (11.65%) |
11 (5.34%) |
46 (22.33%) |
143 (69.42%) |
| Medium | 7 (3.40%) |
4 (1.94%) |
0 |
0 |
5 (2.43%) |
16 (7.77%) |
| High | 3 (1.45%) |
4 (1.94%) |
6 (2.91%) |
0 |
7 (3.40%) |
20(9.70%) |
| Very High | 10 (4.85%) |
6 (2.91%) |
4 (1.94%) |
2 (0.97%) |
5 (2.43%) |
27 (13.10%) |
| Total | 66 (32.03%) |
30(14.56%) |
34 (16.50%) |
13 (6.31%) |
63 (30.59%) |
206 (99.99%) |
Table 1: Distribution of Entry Points of the PADISnet
'It is not 100% since most of the percentages were rounded off.
A random sample of 50 entry points, distributed proportionally across the organization types and levels of use, were selected to be interviewed. However users of only 22 points were actually interviewed.
A baseline questionnaire, designed at the first start-up workshop of the Impact Study held in February 1995 in Addis Ababa was pre-tested with participants of the April 1995 Regional Symposium on Telematics for Development in Africa, held at UNECA in Addis Ababa. It was later distributed to all users of the entry points of the PADISnet via E-mail. Respondents were asked to respond either through E-mail or post the filled out questionnaires to PADIS. Among the respondents to the baseline questionnaires, 22 were interviewed.
Level of Use |
Type of Organization |
|||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total |
|
| Low | 11 |
06 |
13 |
- |
8 |
38 (44.7%) |
| Medium | 02 |
08 |
- |
- |
3 |
13 (15.3%) |
| High | 1 |
5 |
3 |
- |
3 |
12 (14.1%) |
| Very High | 2 |
12 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
22 (25.9%) |
| Total | 16 (18.8%) |
31 (36.5%) |
22 (25.9%) |
1 (1.2%) |
15 (17.6%) |
85' (100%) |
Table 2: Number of Completed Questionnaires Returned
'In most of the subsequent analyses and discussions, either 84 or 83 of them were use-able
Table 2 above shows the distribution of individual respondents across the organizations and levels of use. Users affiliated to Academic and Research institutions and users from the low level of use group were the majority of the respondents.
Female respondents were very few (14.1%) compared to male respondents (85.9%). Respondents from academic & research organizations are also the majority (58.7%) of the local users while 74.4% of the expatriate respondents were private/individual users and users from International organizations. Out of the 39 expatriate respondents, a little more than three fourth were temporary residents (i.e. less than 5 years)
Almost all the respondents (97.6%) are holders of BA/B.Sc. degree or above. On the average, the higher the qualification the greater the number of respondents with more than a third of them being Ph.D./MD holders.
| Computer Skill | Highest Qualification |
|||||
High School Certificate |
Diploma |
BA/B.Sc. |
MA/MSc |
Ph.D./MD |
Total |
|
| Experience | 1 |
1 |
18 |
14 |
13 |
47 (56.0%) |
| Immediate | - |
- |
6 |
11 |
17 |
34 (40.5%) |
| Beginner | - |
- |
1 |
2 |
- |
3 (3.6%) |
| Total | 1 (1.2%) |
1 (1.2%) |
25 (29.8%) |
1 (32.1%) |
15 (36.7%) |
84 (100%) |
Table 3: Computer Skills of the Respondents
Qualification and computer skill of the respondents do not seem to be well correlated for experienced computer users though they do for those who rated their computer skills as intermediate. Only 3.6% of the respondents are beginners while the rest 96.4% are intermediate and experienced computer users, the majority of them (56%) being experienced computer users.
Facility |
Type of Organization |
|||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total |
|
| Telephone | 02 |
08 |
5 |
- |
1 |
16 (19.0%) |
| Telephone & FAX | 05 |
19 |
2 |
- |
6 |
32 (38.1%) |
| Tel., Telex & FAX | 01 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
11 (13.1%) |
| Tel., Telex, FAX & Radio | 07 |
- |
11 |
- |
7 |
25 (29.8%) |
| Total | 16 (17.9%) |
31 (36.9%) |
22 (26.2%) |
1 (1.2%) |
15 (17.9%) |
84 (100%) |
Table 4: Communication Facilities in the Respondents' Organizations
According to Table 4, the principal communication facilities in the respondents' organizations are telephone and fax. However, telex and radio are also available in quite a considerable number of organizations, though they are more available to private/individual respondents and in International and Non-governmental organizations.
As far as essentially of
communicating outside the Country is concerned, almost all of them(96.4%) indicated that
it is essential with only 3.6% saying it is sometimes important. This is reflected in the
percentages of the messages sent by the respondents destined outside the country (Table
13).
Facility |
Type of Organization |
|||||
| Private/Individual | Academic/Research | International | Government | Non-Governmental | Total | |
| Adequate | 02 |
08 |
5 |
- |
1 |
23 (27.7%) |
| Inadequate | 08 |
19 |
2 |
- |
6 |
53 (63.9%) |
| Not Available | 04 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
7 (8.4%) |
| Total | 14 (16.9%) |
31 (37.3%) |
22 (26.5%) |
1 (1.2%) |
15 (18.1%) |
83 (100%) |
Table 5: Adequacy of Information Facilities at the Respondents' Organizations
Most respondents (87.1%) from academic & research institutions, who heavily rely on libraries and information centers for their day to day activities indicated that information facilities at their institutions are inadequate. Their opinion conforms with the usual criticism about the inadequacy, in terms of quality as well as quantity of information, of academic and research libraries in the country.
Frequency |
How Messages are Sent/Received |
||||
At Office From |
At Home from Own Computer |
||||
Own Computer |
Computer on Desk |
Someone's Computer |
Computer Dedicated to E-mail |
||
| Regularly | 18 |
29 |
7 |
25 |
13 |
| Occasionally | 7 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
6 |
| Never | 22 |
15 |
19 |
11 |
19 |
Table 6: Frequency of E-mail Usage: Home vs. Office
Tables 6 above and 7 below show that home computers in general and E-mail facilities at home in particular are not common among the respondents and that is why three fourth of them indicated that they send/receive electronic messages only from their offices. Even most of the private/individual users (62.5%) send/receive electronic messages from their offices.
| From Where They Send/Receive | Type of Organization |
|||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total | |
| Office | 05 |
28 |
17 |
1 |
13 |
64 (75.3%) |
| Home | 06 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
7 (8.2%) |
| Both home & Office | 05 |
3 |
4 |
- |
2 |
14 (15.5%) |
| Total | 16 (18.8%) |
31 (36.5%) |
22 (25.9%) |
1 (1.2%) |
15 (17.6%) |
85 (100%) |
Table 7:
From Where Respondents Send/Receive Electronic Messages
Type of Organization |
||||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total |
|
| Former Email Users | 06 |
09 |
9 |
- |
1 |
25 (29.4%) |
| Current Users of other Networks | 04 |
1 |
8 |
- |
1 |
14 (16.5%) |
Table 8: Earlier E-mail Use and Current Use of Other Networks
Out of the 25 respondents who
indicated that they have used E-mail before, 9 (36%) used for one year and less, 3 (12%)
used for between one and three years, and the remaining 13 (52%) indicated to have used
for three and more years. All of them were holders of a BA/B.Sc. degrees or above, which
means it is likely that they were educated either in Europe or USA (where E-mail services
were in existence for a long time), where they had access to electronic mail facilities in
the institutions they attended. The networks, other than PADISnet, which are currently
being used by the 14 respondents(Table 8) are HealthNet, UN CC-Mail, CGNet and CareNet.
| Email cost is covered by | Type of Organization |
|||||
| Private/Individual | Academic/Research | International | Government | Non-Governmental | Total | |
| Self | 08 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
13 (15.5%) |
| Own Department | 01 |
21 |
8 |
- |
1 |
31 (36.9%) |
| Own Organization | 7 |
6 |
10 |
- |
12 |
35 (41.7%) |
| Project in Organization | - |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
2 (2.4%) |
| Others | - |
2 |
- |
1 |
- |
3 (3.6%) |
| Total | 16 (19.05) |
30 (35.7%) |
22 (26.2%) |
1 (1.2%) |
15 (17.9%) |
84 (100%) |
Table 9: Earlier E-mail Use and Current Use of Other Networks
Most of the respondents (78.6%) indicated that electronic mail cost is covered by either their department or organization. Only 15.5% of the respondents cover the cost for themselves, among which 8(61.5%) are private/individual users.
According to Table 10, more
than three fourth of the respondents send an average of one message per working day
(Monday - Friday). Most(74.4%) of the respondents who indicated that they login and type
their messages are experienced computer users and those with intermediate computer skills.
Similarly, the frequency with which respondents send electronic messages drops with their
computer skills. Generally, Tables 10 and 11 below show us that mode and frequency of
sending electronic messages depend on the computer skills of the users.
Computer Skills |
How Often They Send |
||||
Less than 1 per Month |
1 to 4 per Month |
1 to 5 per Week |
1 or more per Day |
Total |
|
| Experienced | 2 |
5 |
18 |
21 |
46 (56.1%) |
| Intermediate | 5 |
8 |
12 |
8 |
33 (40.1%) |
| Beginners | - |
- |
2 |
1 |
3 (3.7%) |
| Total | 7 (8.5%) |
13 (15.9%) |
32 (39.0%) |
30 (36.6%) |
82 (100%) |
Table
10: Computer Skills vs. Frequency of Usage
Email Used for |
Frequency of Usage |
||||
Less than 1 per Month |
1 to 4 per Month |
1 to 5 per Week |
1 or more per Day |
Total |
|
| Personal Message | 20 |
13 |
21 |
7 |
61 (71.7%) |
| Arranging Meetings | 15 |
6 |
12 |
2 |
35 (41.2%) |
| Regular Business | 4 |
13 |
17 |
10 |
44 (51.7%) |
| Managing Projects | 8 |
8 |
11 |
7 |
34 (40.0%) |
| Exchanging Ideas | 11 |
21 |
9 |
4 |
44 (51.7%) |
| Receiving Technical Advice | 23 |
20 |
8 |
3 |
54 (63.5%) |
| Providing Technical Advice | 20 |
9 |
6 |
6 |
41 (48.2%) |
| Literature Searches | 11 |
9 |
5 |
7 |
32 (375%) |
| Exchange of Documents | 19 |
16 |
15 |
4 |
54 (63.5%) |
| Computer conference | 5 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
13 (15.3%) |
Table 11: What for and How Frequent Respondents were Using E-mail
Even though electronic mail was heavily used(by many respondents) for sending/receiving personal messages (Table 11), it was less frequently used for the same purpose and most frequently used for regular business. Among the purposes for which E-mail was heavily used for are regular business, providing/receiving technical advise and exchange of documents. It was least used for computer conferences.
| Email Used for | Frequency with which they Send Messages | ||||
| Less than 1 per Month | 1 to 4 per Month | 1 to 5 per Week | 1 or more per Day | Total | |
| Surface Mail | 20 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 40 (47.0%) |
| Air Mail | 7 | 28 | 29 | 14 | 78 (91.7%) |
| Telephone | 6 | 7 | 13 | 45 | 71 (83.5%) |
| Telex | 19 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 28 (32.9%) |
| Fax | 14 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 64 (75.3%) |
| Travel For Document Delivery | 10 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 23 (27.0%) |
| Travel for Meetings | 26 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 41 (48.2%) |
Table 12: Other Channels used by Respondents and Frequency of Usage
According to Table 12, telephone is the most frequently used communication channel by the respondents while air mail was the most heavily used channel. Fax, travel for document delivery and surface mail are the 2nd, 3rd and 4th most used channels of communication.
% of Electronic Messages |
% of Respondents Who Indicated that Their Messages were Destined for |
||
|
Outside Africa |
Within Africa But Outside the Country |
Within the Country |
< 10 |
2.4 |
72.5 |
82.1 |
11 - 20 |
- |
12.5 |
7.7 |
21 - 30 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
2.6 |
31 - 40 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
2.6 |
41 - 50 |
1.2 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
51 - 60 |
6.0 |
- |
1.3 |
61 - 70 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
71 - 80 |
25.3 |
- |
- |
81 - 90 |
22.9 |
1.3 |
- |
91 - 100 |
32.5 |
- |
1.3 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Table 13:
Percentage of Electronic Messages Sent Outside Africa, Within Africa and Within the
Country
About 87.9% respondents indicated that more than 50% of their messages are destined outside Africa while almost three fourth(72.5%) and 82.1% said that less than 10% of their messages were destined within Africa but outside the country and within the country, respectively. This may lead us to conclude that communication among the PADISnet users is insignificant and electronic communication was mainly used for communicating outside the country.
Improvements |
% of respondents who indicated this |
|||||
Private/Individual |
Academic/Research |
International |
Government |
Non-Governmental |
Total |
|
| Increased Speed & Efficiency and Decreased Cost of Communication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Increased contact and Exchange of Ideas/Data with Colleagues and Fellow Professionals Within and Outside the Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Access to Current Information & Documents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attending/Getting results of Conferences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 14: Improvements Brought in the Respondents' Work by the Use of Electronic Communications
There is no marked difference among the respondents across the organizations in the
improvements brought in their work by electronic communications. What is more, 'Increased
Speed & Efficiency and Decreased Cost of Communication' was rated by all groups as the
significant improvement. Decreased cost of electronic communication has been well
demonstrated by Lishan(1993) who estimated the E-mail - Fax cost ratio between Addis Ababa
and London as 1:6, on the average. That is the same size of document will cost about 6
times higher when transmitted via fax than via E-mail.
Difficulties |
% of respondents who indicated this |
|||||
| Private/Individual | Academic/Research | International | Government | Non-Governmental | Total | |
| Delayed/Undelivered Messages | 1.2 |
5.9 |
3.5 |
- |
5.9 |
16.5 |
| Too much/Unwanted mail and Information Overload | 1.2 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
1.2 |
9.4 |
| Managing E-mail is Time Consuming | 2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
- |
2.4 |
9.6 |
| Increased dependence on Electronic Communication and forgetting to make hard Copies of Messages | 1.2 |
3.5 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
5.9 |
Table 15: Difficulties Brought in the Respondents' Work by the Use of Electronic Communications
Very few respondents listed difficulties brought in their work by electronic communication. The top most difficulty is 'Delayed/Undelivered Messages' which led to resending/receiving the messages via other alternative channels of communication such as Fax.
Constraints |
% of respondents who indicated this |
|||||
| Private/Individual | Academic/Research | International | Government | Non-Governmental | Total | |
| Lack of Direct Access to the Internet | 4.7 |
10.6 |
7.1 |
1.2 |
5.9 |
29.5 |
| Lack of funds, Maintenance and enough Workstations/modems | 5.9 |
7.1 |
10.6 |
- |
3.5 |
27.1 |
| User Un-friendliness and limited features of the E-mail Software (Frontdoor) | 1.2 |
12.9 |
8.2 |
- |
1.2 |
23.5 |
| Too many Users of the PADISnet that make the line to the Mail Server busy most of the time(i.e. Absence of other service Providers) | 1.2 |
10.5 |
2.4 |
- |
2.4 |
16.5 |
| Lack of Expertise and Knowledge of What can be Achieved with E-mail | 3.5 |
5.9 |
2.4 |
- |
4.7 |
16.5 |
| Poor(Improperly Working) Telephone Lines | 2.4 |
8.2 |
2.4 |
- |
1.2 |
14.2 |
| Lack of Privacy | - |
1.2 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
2.4 |
| Lack of E-mail Directory | - |
- |
1.2 |
- |
- |
1.2 |
Table 16: Constraints to the Respondents for Making Effective Use of Electronic Communications
Respondents seem to have realized the potential of full Internet connection for overcoming the current problems associated with the current store-and-forward E-mail system. That is why they have rated 'Lack of Direct Access to the Internet' as the first major constraint and 'User Un-friendliness and limited features of the E-mail Software (Frontdoor)' as the third major constraint for making effective use of electronic communications. Not successful file attachment facility, Non-networkability, limited length of recipient's address, unavailability of a facility for confirmation of receipt of the message at the other end are among the limitations of the software mentioned.
The purpose of the interviews was to solicit information regarding communication related problems/difficulties faced by users of PADISnet, their causes, effects and measures taken to solve them before and after they had access to electronic communication. Results are summarized below.
Very few pronounced specific
success and/or failure stories. The only failure stories before they had access to
electronic communications mentioned are:
Success stories after they had access to electronic communications:
Analysis and interpretation of the
responses to the baseline questionnaire and interview led to the following conclusions.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to users of the PADISnet for their cooperation in the implementation of the survey. I am particularly indebted to the International Development Research Center (IDRC) of Canada; Nancy Hafkin and Lishan Adam of PADIS for giving me the opportunity to undertake the consultancy assignment to conduct the survey study; Michael Menou for his unreserved guidance throughout the survey; and my friend and colleague, Daniel Gelaw, for his useful assistance whenever needed.
Note from the
editor: For details about this survey, including, the sampling method used;
construction of the questionnaires; interview items; and the validity as well as the
reliability considerations taken into account, please contact the author directly.
About the Author: Abebe Rorissa is an
Automation Librarian at the National University of Lesotho, Southern Africa. He can be
reached at National University of Lesotho, P. O. Roma 180, Lesotho, Southern Africa. Tel:
(+266) 340601 Ext. 2267, E-mail: abeber@LIB.NUL.LS