By
Brenda Zulu, 15 March 2006
While
trade offer opportunities for women’s socio-economic
empowerment and growth in Africa, it can perpetuate
women’s marginalisation and gender inequalities,
which in turn hamper growth and development, the ultimate
goal of trade.
Speaking at the on going forum on Information Communication
Technologies (ICT), Trade and Economic at the United
Nations Conference Center, Ngone Diop from the African
Center for Gender and Development (ACGD) said that
Trade was not gender neutral. She observed that Trade
agreements, policies and mechanisms have different
impacts on women and men.
“Gender refers to socially constructed differences
in attributes and opportunities associated with being
female or male and to the social interactions and
relationships between women and men. It determines
what is expected, allowed and valued in woman and
man in a given context,” said Diop.
She added that Trade and ICTs can be a critical pathway
to socio-economic growth and development in Africa
but without a gender perspective, the potential benefits
of ICTs and Trade will not benefit women and girls.
Rather, they will perpetuate gender inequalities and
the socio-economic exclusion of women and other vulnerable
groups, ultimately hampering Africa’s development
prospects.
ICTs can play a critical role in mitigating women’s
marginalisation in Trade, which is a male dominated
sector in Africa.
She pointed out that many various empirical studies
have documented gender and women’s concerns
in trade, in Africa such as Mohau Pheko 2005 and that
as stated by D. Elson “the seemingly neutral
macro-economic policies including trade become male
biased when implemented in a social context that discriminates
against women”.
She explained that the structure of the social power
relationships between men and women shape their access
to and command over resources including: education,
land, financial resources, market, information and
technology, all of which being essential for women
and men’s effective participation in and benefit
from national, regional and international trade.
Diop said that gender and trade could be analysed
in three categories such as the micro level where
the gender imbalances at the household level in terms
of bargaining power, division of labor (burden of
unpaid care work), access to and control over resources,
etc affect women’s effective participation in
trade.
The second category was Meso level where promotion
of export-oriented production in Africa (export processing
zone(EPZs) as a response to globalisation was associated
with a gender segmentation of the labour force.
Diop observed that Women are over represented in low-paid,
low skills export-oriented sectors such as horticultural
and floricultural sectors and in fisheries. They work
in unhealthy conditions. They face employment insecurity,
lack of protection, gender stereotypes and sexual
harassment.
She said that a study in Kenya suggests that women
workers in the horticultural and floricultural sectors
experience harsh working conditions while living in
secluded compounds far from their own villages.
While women’s share in low paid work increases,
their reproductive tasks/unpaid care work does not
decrease, as there is no change in the division of
labor in the household.
Diop explained that in the third category Macro level,
Trade negotiations are men’s monopoly; women’s
voices remain absent in the various trade negotiations
and agreements. Trade reforms advantage large and
medium producers who have access to and command of
information, markets, capital, and resources. Those
producers are mainly men.
She said reduction in tariffs and other forms of trade
taxes associated with World Trade Organisation (WTO)
regulations lead to: reduction of government’s
spending on social services; commodification of social
services (health, education) and shift of the costs
the public to the private sphere (the home), leads
to increase women’s invisible and unpaid burden
of care work.
The critical role of ICTs Diop explained ICTs are
a tool for a socio-economic transformation. They can
positively change the ways the socio-economic actors
produce, consume, and exchange the ways they think
and act. She explained that development was about
positive structural changes so; ICTs are strongly
related to development.
As such, ICTs constitute a powerful device to mitigate
the gender imbalances that constraint woman from effectively
participating in and benefiting from Trade.
It is a powerful tool for women’s socio-economic
empowerment.