| Joint ECA-ADB Symposium
“Capacity Development for Achieving the MDGs in Africa”
Opening Remarks
By K.Y. Amoako
Executive Secretary
Abuja, Nigeria
15 May 2005
Mr. Chairman,
His Excellency, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Vice President, Federal Republic
of Nigeria,
Mr. Omar Kabbaj, President, African Development Bank,
Colleagues,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is a great pleasure
to welcome you all to the third African Development Bank Symposium jointly
sponsored with the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA).
I would like to take
this opportunity to express our deep gratitude to His Excellency, Alhaji
Atiku Abubakar for being with us this morning.
The support and engagement
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria throughout the past week has been first
class and a testament to your country’s deep commitment to the development
of our continent.
Through you, I also
want to reiterate our thanks to the Government and people of Nigeria for
your warm hospitality.
Mr. Chairman,
As in the past, when
we focused on HIV/AIDS and Gender, this year’s theme- Capacity Development-
addresses a critical issue. This meeting is therefore another valuable
opportunity for a fruitful dialogue that can provide input to our quest
to achieve the Millennium Development Goals in Africa.
It is clear, as has
been repeatedly said in the past few days, during the ECA Conference of
Ministers, that significant effort is needed to put Africa, as a whole,
on track to meeting the Goals.
Although there are
some bright spots in North Africa, and occasionally in specific countries
such as Botswana, Mauritius and South Africa, sub-Saharan Africa has seen
the least progress towards the goals and even suffered reverses in some
crucial areas.
That does not mean,
however, that genuine and tangible results have not been registered. Some
countries have shown significant progress on goals such as achieving universal
primary education; combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; and
ensuring environmental sustainability.
Several factors have
contributed to the failure of African countries to make sufficient headway
towards the MDGs.
They include conflict,
bad governance, poor economic policies, the debt burden, unfair terms
of trade in the global economy and the lack of access to developed world
markets, as well as the devastating impact of the HIV/AID pandemic.
Although Africa has
collectively been taking steps to address these concerns particularly
through the African Union and New Partnership for Africa’s Development
(NEPAD) framework, it is imperative that much more be done to address
the constraints hindering our progress.
It is for that reason
that two recent reports “In Larger Freedom”, from the UN Secretary
General, and “Our Common Interest” from the Commission for
Africa, have called for a big push- a major scaling up- of effort and
resources to help Africa achieve the Goals.
Furthermore, it is
evident that there is a pressing need to tackle the various capacity deficits
that have been a major contributing factor in the poor performance we
are registering.
In that context, we at ECA and our colleagues at ADB were keen to focus
on this theme today as we believe the issue deserves much greater attention
from Africa’s policy makers, development analysts, and development
partners.
Honourable Ministers,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The notion that Africa
needs a major scaling up of public investment and that we need to build
capacity is not new.
Considerable resources
have been channeled into the public sector over the years with the expectation
that poverty will be reduced.
The findings of recent studies point to the fact that the efficiency of
public investment is dependent significantly on the quality and effectiveness
of a country’s human capital, governance institutions, and policies.
Put positively, this
means that where the human capacity exists to develop credible and well-researched
and planned strategies for reducing poverty, good outcomes are likely.
Where public institutions
are efficient, transparent and decentralized, where they consult effectively
with both state and non-state stakeholders, and where there is accountability,
the development outcomes are encouraging.
We often have insufficient
human capital to implement our development strategies either because we
have not trained enough people, or because those we have trained have
left for better opportunities abroad. Stakeholders lack confidence in
the relevant institutions and do not have the leverage or the access to
hold those institutions to account. It is not surprising if, in that context,
results fail to live up to expectations.
There are many reasons
why our capacity – whether human or institutional – sometimes
falls short. However, at the heart we are dealing with issues of governance
and the challenge of creating the capable state in Africa.
This is the main finding
of the ECA’s groundbreaking project to measure and monitor governance
in Africa, which will be published in the forthcoming African Governance
Report.
Our research has highlighted
priority areas in need of critical attention.
For example, peace
and security are essential elements in any national efforts to build and
effectively utilize capacities but we have seen a great deal of conflict.
Much of the “brain drain” which has occurred in Africa can
be traced not only to poor economic conditions, but also to political
violence, repression of human rights, and lack of a political atmosphere
conducive to free and open debate.
In addition, poor
economic policies have constrained capacity building, both by discouraging
public investment in critical areas of training and education and by reinforcing
under-utilization of some existing capacities. Major cuts in public expenditure
under the structural adjustment programmes of the 1980s and 90s also led
to the loss of critical capacity. And we are still dealing with that legacy.
Then the HIV/AIDS
pandemic, and other devastating diseases, malaria and TB, have cruelly
hit the most productive and economically active members of our society.
Furthermore, past
experience has shown the need for ‘national’ ownership of
– and responsibility for - the building of capacities and their
effective utilization. Yet too often, our partners’ agendas have
driven the formulation of strategies and plans. And their technical assistance
has greatly constrained the longterm development of indigenous capacity.
Finally, we have not
always mainstreamed the MDGs throughout government policies, but assembled
instead, a mix of strategies to tackle poverty and achieve development
that may contradict or duplicate each other.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
All this matters because
we are possibly at the threshold of a new period in which far greater
sums of ODA will begin to flow. As I alluded to earlier, the UN Secretary
General’s report, In larger Freedom calls for substantial increases
in ODA, as does the Commission for Africa in its report.
And with the situation
I have outlined above, it is not surprising that questions are being raised
about our capacity to absorb and make good use of these additional funds.
The Commission for
Africa, on which I serve, did address this issue in depth and concluded
that there is indeed a capacity challenge that must be met.
However, our analysis
noted that there is room for higher levels of ODA than are currently being
delivered, as African countries have made significant strides in recent
years to improve their absorptive capacity.
That said, our report
also argued that a well-funded action plan must be developed to directly
address Africa’s huge capacity deficits, including in area of macroeconomic
policy implementation and aid management. This is, I believe critically
important to the success of all our efforts.
As we move towards
that vision, it is clear that certain key objectives need to be achieved
on both sides of the development partnership.
Here in Africa, as
we develop bold, innovative and holistic plans to build capacity there
are a number of key areas that need focus.
These include:
§ Fostering a
well paid, professional, civil service, that is resourced with training
and solid statistical data.
§ Strengthening accountability mechanisms in institutions such as
parliament and the judiciary.
§ Investment in intellectual capacities…. our universities,
research institutes, scientists, artists and the media must be nurtured
and respected.
§ And we must draw more on our wealth of talent and expertise in
the Diaspora.
On our partners side
we need to see an alignment of their support with our priorities and plans.
Specifically, they can:
§ Work to stem
the Brain drain, particularly in key areas such as health and education.
§ Make greater use of our research and think tanks and policy institutions
here in Africa.
§ Make aid flows more predictable, and follow good practices on technical
assistance and capacity building.
Your Excellencies,
Distinguished Guests, and
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The topics of the
plenary and various panel sessions collectively encapsulate the key issues
that need to be addressed. In short, these are as follows:
§ How best to
develop capacity at the country-level in order to manage the process of
scaling up efforts to achieve the MDGs.
§ What types of public private partnerships will be most effective
for stimulating economic growth and poverty reduction?
§ What specific interventions are needed to improve capacity in essential
sectors such as health, in particular scaling up the response to HIV/AIDs,
and education?
§ How can partnerships between all stakeholders be best enhanced
in order to enable the big push for the MDGs that we envisage?
In discussing them
today, we should also look ahead to the operationalization of a comprehensive
regional capacity-building action plan that focuses on national specificities
while sharing core commitments and objectives, and which is developed,
owned and led here in Africa, but backed by a consensus of support from
the international community.
If this can be achieved,
I believe we can successfully handle a massive scaling up of resources
for public and private investments in physical infrastructure and human-capital
intensive sectors such as education, health and agriculture.
In concluding, I sincerely
want to thank you for being here. I have every confidence that our deliberations
today and the set of recommendations we will develop will be invaluable
input to ECA’s ongoing research about capacity-building at all levels,
as well as for all institutions working in this area at this critical
juncture. Here’s to a very productive day.
Thank you.
|